> One of those harmful things is recommending of IceCat which is apparently unmaintained. But it is not good enough on other sides.Īnd all this leads me to a conclusion that we should make our own opinions on things like Ungoogled Chromium I am not saying FSF is thoroughly bad - it serves its purpose of officially representing the swfreedom movement. But the final though is this: FSF is not reliable (feel free to ask me to elaborate on that in some new thread). I could go on with LibreJS circus, FSF's git hosting site idea, etc. People should rather be warned against using it - for security reasons (I realize most forked browsers are not as delayed and insecure as some online articles say, but IceCat is an exception that is indeed a lot behind). The latest release seems to have recently celebrated its 2nd birthday. One of those harmful things is recommending of IceCat which is apparently unmaintained. The actual problem is FSF doing useless of even harmful things *instead* of those important ones. After all, limited amount of resources could be an excuse for that. Seriously, it's not just that FSF is not doing many important things that should be done.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |